October 2026 allocation · decision date 30 September 2026

GSMIF macro allocation

A monthly macro portfolio compared with 70% global stocks and 30% US Treasuries.

Spring / Summer split

Season percentages

Spring31.24%
Stronger growth · cooling inflation
Summer30.29%
Stronger growth · heating inflation
Fall18.94%
Weaker growth · heating inflation
Winter19.54%
Weaker growth · cooling inflation

Growth and inflation determine the season percentages used for allocation. Liquidity adjusts the holdings.

The four macro seasons

Company profits depend partly on demand. Inflation affects costs, purchasing power and interest rates. We combine these two forces to describe four economic conditions, each with a different starting portfolio.

We measure whether economic activity is getting stronger or weaker and whether price pressure is heating up or cooling. The season names describe these combinations. They can last for months, overlap or reverse without following the calendar.

Spring · Recovery

Stronger growth · cooling inflation

Production and hiring improve while price pressure eases. Better demand can lift profits. Less inflation pressure can give interest rates room to fall.

Assets that may benefit: broad stocks, technology, semiconductors, smaller companies and homebuilders. They gain from stronger sales, business investment or more affordable financing.

Example ETFs: SPY, QQQ, SMH, IWM and XHB. Expensive shares can still fall even when the economy improves.

Summer · Expansion

Stronger growth · heating inflation

Demand strengthens and puts pressure on supply. Energy, materials and industrial companies may benefit from higher volumes or selling prices.

Assets that may benefit: those sectors, broad commodities, copper and selected emerging-market stocks. Inflation-linked Treasuries add protection against rising consumer prices.

Examples: XLE, XLB, XLI, DBC, CPER, EEM and TIP. Rising interest rates or a stronger dollar can offset these benefits.

Fall · Stagflation

Weaker growth · heating inflation

Businesses face softer demand and higher costs. A supply disruption can create this combination even when consumers are spending less.

Assets that may hold up better: short-term Treasuries, consumer staples and healthcare stocks. Gold, commodities and inflation-linked bonds may also help, depending on the shock.

Examples: BIL, SHY, XLP, XLV, GLD, DBC and TIP. Commodity prices can reverse. Inflation-linked bond funds can lose value when interest rates rise.

Winter · Slowdown

Weaker growth · cooling inflation

Demand and price pressure ease together. Falling interest rates can raise the value of existing Treasury bonds. Spending on food and healthcare tends to be steadier than discretionary purchases.

Assets that may hold up better: Treasuries, defensive stocks and sometimes gold or safe-haven currencies. Longer-term bonds benefit most if yields fall, but lose more if yields rise.

Examples: TLT, IEF, XLP, XLV, USMV, GLD, FXY and FXF.

Assets can respond differently from these examples. Prices also reflect what investors already expect. Gold responds to interest rates and the dollar as well as inflation. Currency funds can move against the portfolio. The current holdings below also reflect price trends and GSMIF's allocation limits.

How the theory relates to this model

We group assets by how they respond to growth, inflation and financing conditions. The examples above describe typical exposures. We start with four fixed ETF baskets, shown below, and adjust their weights each month using the portfolio rules.

Our Winter basket includes growth stocks and gold miners. The trend rule can move these holdings to BIL before we apply GSMIF's government allocation and ETF limits.

We measure mostly US economic conditions, alongside US and international investment prices. We do not calculate separate growth and inflation scores for every country. A positive growth score means the combined readings are stronger than their own historical averages. It can occur during a weak economy that is improving. Cooling inflation means easing price pressure. Consumer prices may still be rising.

Background reading: Bridgewater on growth, inflation and asset exposures; Fidelity on sectors through the business cycle; US Treasury on inflation-linked bonds. These sources explain the general investment principles. Our settings and results still need their own testing.

How we measure the economy

We combine published economic data with market prices. Production, jobs and consumer prices describe the economy. Stock, bond and commodity prices add investors' changing expectations and can also reflect market sentiment.

Growth combines five readings on activity and demand. Inflation combines four readings on price pressure. Liquidity combines four readings on money supply and financing conditions: whether money and borrowing are becoming easier or tighter.

  1. Measure a change. For example, compare industrial production with six months earlier, or payrolls with three months earlier. Each reading uses the time period listed below.
  2. Put different units on the same scale. Compare each change with its own history, using up to ten years of monthly readings. Zero means its historical average. Positive and negative scores show which side of that average it falls on. We cap scores at +3 or −3 to reduce the influence of extreme readings.
  3. Average within each group. We give available readings equal weight and exclude missing or stale ones. At least two readings are required per group. The final score combines two-thirds of the new average with one-third of the previous month's final score to reduce abrupt changes.

The measurement periods, equal weights and smoothing are choices we test. Economic theory alone cannot tell us which settings work best.

GrowthIs economic activity strengthening?+0.352

5 signals · equal weights

Growth

Final score+0.352

We use industrial production, payrolls and new unemployment claims from ALFRED, taking the versions available by each decision date. Yahoo Finance supplies prices for industrials, consumer staples, broad US stocks and Treasuries. These readings track business activity, hiring and whether investors favor assets that benefit from stronger growth.

Positive scores mean stronger growth relative to its history. Zero is neutral relative to history. Growth or inflation can still be positive.

Reading and measurement periodScore
Industrial productionChange over six months+0.129

Measures output from factories, mines and utilities. Stronger production growth raises this score.

SourceReading usedObservation / availability
Industrial productionALFRED · INDPRO103.068 indexAug 2026Available by 18 Sep 2026

Change used: +1.1347 log percentage points. Historical average +0.6765; standard deviation 3.5539; 118 monthly observations. Standardized score +0.1289.

JobsChange in nonfarm payrolls over three months-0.059

Stronger hiring suggests businesses need more workers and households have more employment income.

SourceReading usedObservation / availability
Nonfarm payrollsALFRED · PAYEMS159,075 thousand jobsAug 2026Available by 04 Sep 2026

Change used: +0.1346 log percentage points. Historical average +0.2700; standard deviation 2.2865; 118 monthly observations. Standardized score -0.0592.

New unemployment claimsThree-month change in a two-month average+0.144

Fewer new claims suggest fewer layoffs. The sign is reversed so falling claims count toward stronger growth.

SourceReading usedObservation / availability
Initial jobless claimsALFRED · ICSA197,000 claims19 Sep 2026Available by 24 Sep 2026

Change used: +7.2321 log percentage points. Historical average +0.6733; standard deviation 45.6322; 120 monthly observations. Standardized score +0.1437.

Industrials compared with consumer staplesSix-month change in the XLI / XLP price ratio+0.132

Industrial companies depend more on business spending than sellers of everyday essentials. Their relative performance adds a market reading of demand.

SourceReading usedObservation / availability
Industrials ETFYahoo Finance · XLI166.98 USD adjusted30 Sep 2026Available by 30 Sep 2026
Consumer staples ETFYahoo Finance · XLP80.60 USD adjusted30 Sep 2026Available by 30 Sep 2026

Change used: +4.0594 log percentage points. Historical average +2.9330; standard deviation 8.5394; 120 monthly observations. Standardized score +0.1319.

Stocks compared with TreasuriesSix-month change in the SPY / IEF price ratio+1.622

Stocks outperforming Treasuries can signal confidence in growth. Interest rates and investor sentiment can also move this ratio.

SourceReading usedObservation / availability
S&P 500 ETFYahoo Finance · SPY762.63 USD adjusted30 Sep 2026Available by 30 Sep 2026
7-10 year Treasury ETFYahoo Finance · IEF89.31 USD adjusted30 Sep 2026Available by 30 Sep 2026

Change used: +21.0436 log percentage points. Historical average +6.8552; standard deviation 8.7469; 120 monthly observations. Standardized score +1.6221.

Average of 5 available signals+0.3935
Previous month's final score+0.2689
Final: 2/3 new + 1/3 previous+0.3520
How we calculate the final score

((+0.129) + (-0.059) + (+0.144) + (+0.132) + (+1.622)) ÷ 5 = +0.3935

Two-thirds of +0.3935, plus one-third of +0.2689, gives +0.3520. We calculate with unrounded values and round them for display.

InflationIs price pressure heating up?-0.023

4 signals · equal weights

Inflation

Final score-0.023

We use consumer prices, five-year breakeven inflation and WTI oil from ALFRED, taking the versions available by each decision date. Yahoo Finance supplies inflation-linked and conventional Treasury ETF prices. These readings track price pressure and investors' inflation expectations.

Positive scores mean hotter inflation relative to its history. Zero is neutral relative to history. Growth or inflation can still be positive.

Reading and measurement periodScore
Consumer-price inflationChange in annual CPI inflation over three months-0.967

Shows whether annual consumer-price inflation is accelerating or slowing.

SourceReading usedObservation / availability
Consumer price indexALFRED · CPIAUCSL334.131 indexAug 2026Available by 11 Sep 2026

Change used: -0.7841 log percentage points. Historical average +0.0631; standard deviation 0.8758; 118 monthly observations. Standardized score -0.9673.

Market-implied inflationChange over three months+0.240

The yield difference between conventional and inflation-linked five-year Treasuries adds a market estimate of inflation. It also reflects demand for inflation protection and differences in trading conditions.

SourceReading usedObservation / availability
Five-year breakeven inflationALFRED · T5YIE2.36 %30 Sep 2026Available by 30 Sep 2026

Change used: +0.1000 percentage points. Historical average +0.0240; standard deviation 0.3166; 120 monthly observations. Standardized score +0.2401.

Oil pricesChange in WTI oil over six months+0.126

Oil affects energy and transport costs. A rise can add price pressure even when demand is weak.

SourceReading usedObservation / availability
WTI crude oilALFRED · DCOILWTICO96.16 USD/barrel29 Sep 2026Available by 30 Sep 2026

Change used: +7.3676 log percentage points. Historical average +3.5710; standard deviation 30.0986; 118 monthly observations. Standardized score +0.1261.

Inflation-linked compared with conventional TreasuriesSix-month change in the TIP / IEF price ratio+0.416

Outperformance by inflation-linked bonds adds evidence of demand for inflation protection. The funds have different interest-rate exposures, so this is an imperfect measure.

SourceReading usedObservation / availability
Inflation-linked Treasury ETFYahoo Finance · TIP104.04 USD adjusted30 Sep 2026Available by 30 Sep 2026
7-10 year Treasury ETFYahoo Finance · IEF89.31 USD adjusted30 Sep 2026Available by 30 Sep 2026

Change used: +2.0758 log percentage points. Historical average +0.9193; standard deviation 2.7814; 120 monthly observations. Standardized score +0.4158.

Average of 4 available signals-0.0463
Previous month's final score+0.0233
Final: 2/3 new + 1/3 previous-0.0231
How we calculate the final score

((-0.967) + (+0.240) + (+0.126) + (+0.416)) ÷ 4 = -0.0463

Two-thirds of -0.0463, plus one-third of +0.0233, gives -0.0231. We calculate with unrounded values and round them for display.

LiquidityAre money and financing conditions getting easier?-0.091

4 signals · equal weights

Liquidity

Final score-0.091

ALFRED supplies M2, a measure of money that includes cash and bank deposits. FRED supplies the Chicago Fed financial conditions index, the two-year Treasury yield, Fed assets, reverse repos and the Treasury General Account. These readings track access to money and borrowing costs.

Positive scores mean easier liquidity relative to its history. Zero is neutral relative to history. Growth or inflation can still be positive.

Reading and measurement periodScore
Financial conditionsEqual mix of the index level and its three-month change+0.404

The Chicago Fed index combines measures of credit, borrowing and financial-market stress. We reverse the sign so lower readings count toward easier conditions. This reading receives 25% of the liquidity average.

SourceReading usedObservation / availability
Chicago Fed financial conditionsFRED · NFCI-0.553 index18 Sep 2026Available by 25 Sep 2026

Level: +0.5530 index units. Historical average +0.4602; standard deviation 0.1616; 120 monthly observations. Standardized score +0.5744.

Change: +0.0420 index units. Historical average +0.0048; standard deviation 0.1587; 120 monthly observations. Standardized score +0.2344.

Money supplyChange in M2 over six months+0.039

Faster growth in the broad money supply raises this score. It does not show how much money will be invested in stocks.

SourceReading usedObservation / availability
M2 money supplyALFRED · M2SL23,342.80 USD billionsAug 2026Available by 22 Sep 2026

Change used: +3.2396 log percentage points. Historical average +3.0902; standard deviation 3.7891; 120 monthly observations. Standardized score +0.0394.

Two-year Treasury yieldChange over twelve months-0.738

This yield reflects expectations for near-term interest rates. A decline counts toward easier financing. It can also reflect concern about weaker growth.

SourceReading usedObservation / availability
Two-year Treasury yieldFRED · DGS24.89 %29 Sep 2026Available by 29 Sep 2026

Change used: -1.2900 percentage points. Historical average -0.3105; standard deviation 1.3264; 120 monthly observations. Standardized score -0.7385.

Fed assets less cash held at the FedChange over three months-0.289

We subtract reverse repos and the Treasury General Account from Fed assets. This liquidity measure covers only those balance-sheet quantities.

SourceReading usedObservation / availability
Fed balance sheetFRED · WALCL6,747,704 USD millions23 Sep 2026Available by 30 Sep 2026
Reverse reposFRED · RRPONTSYD11.54 USD billions30 Sep 2026Available by 30 Sep 2026
Treasury General AccountFRED · WTREGEN977,084 USD millions23 Sep 2026Available by 30 Sep 2026

Change used: -1.2035 log percentage points. Historical average +0.9793; standard deviation 7.5600; 120 monthly observations. Standardized score -0.2887.

Average of 4 available signals-0.1458
Previous month's final score+0.0179
Final: 2/3 new + 1/3 previous-0.0913
How we calculate the final score

((+0.404) + (+0.039) + (-0.738) + (-0.289)) ÷ 4 = -0.1458

Two-thirds of -0.1458, plus one-third of +0.0179, gives -0.0913. We calculate with unrounded values and round them for display.

The financial conditions reading averages two scores: the sign-reversed NFCI level and its sign-reversed three-month change. Each supplies 12.5% of the four-reading liquidity average. Lower NFCI and falling two-year yields count toward easier conditions.

Fed assets 6,747,704 million minus reverse repos 11.54 billion × 1,000 minus the Treasury account 977,084 million = 5,759,081 million dollars. All three quantities are converted to millions of dollars before subtraction.

Reverse repos are cash placed with the Fed against securities. The Treasury General Account is the US government's account at the Fed. Subtracting both gives the balance-sheet measure used here.

Source dates and historical-data limits

The decision date is 30 September 2026. A reading may refer to an earlier month because economic statistics are published with a delay. The source tables give the observation and availability dates used by the calculation.

ALFRED supplies the historical versions of industrial production, payrolls, jobless claims, CPI, five-year breakeven inflation and WTI oil available by each growth/inflation decision. Yahoo Finance supplies adjusted ETF prices. M2 also uses ALFRED.

For the remaining liquidity data, we apply publication delays to revised FRED histories. Earlier observations may therefore include revisions published later. This leaves data-revision risk in the liquidity backtest.

Exact scoring convention

For each reading, subtract the average of its last 120 monthly observations, including the decision month. Divide by the typical size of departures from that average, measured as the standard deviation. At least 36 observations are required. Cap the score at ±3.

Quantities and price ratios use logarithmic changes, which measure proportional changes on a consistent scale. Yield changes use percentage points. The source details show the exact values and arithmetic.

How the scores become season percentages

The growth score divides weight between stronger and weaker growth. The inflation score divides weight between heating and cooling inflation. Zero gives a 50/50 split. Stronger positive or negative readings shift more weight toward the corresponding direction.

We combine the two splits to obtain the four season weights. A mild or mixed reading keeps several season portfolios in use. If both scores are zero, each season receives 25%.

Growth score+0.352061.52% toward stronger growth
Inflation score-0.023149.23% toward heating inflation

For October 2026, Spring receives 61.52% × 50.77% = 31.24%: the stronger-growth share multiplied by the cooling-inflation share.

A season's percentage is its share of the starting allocation. We have not calibrated these percentages as forecast probabilities. They set next month's allocation without predicting how long a season will last.

All four calculations and the 0.75 setting

The 0.75 setting controls how strongly a score changes the split. A score of +0.75 gives roughly 73% to stronger growth or heating inflation. −0.75 gives roughly 27%. We use the same setting each month.

SeasonDirectional shares multipliedFinal
Spring61.52% × 50.77%31.24%
Summer61.52% × 49.23%30.29%
Fall38.48% × 49.23%18.94%
Winter38.48% × 50.77%19.54%

The exact conversion is 1 / (1 + exp(−score / 0.75)). The other direction receives the remaining share. Calculations use unrounded values, so the four weights total 100% before display rounding.

Where liquidity changes the portfolio

Growth and inflation set the season percentages. Easier financing can then increase the allocation to economically sensitive stocks and commodities. Tighter conditions shift money toward Treasuries, gold and defensive stocks.

Before we apply the GSMIF limits, each +1 liquidity score moves 12.5 percentage points toward the riskier group, up to 15 points. Each −1 moves 12.5 points the other way, up to 25 points. We can transfer only the holdings available to sell. We then apply the 30% government allocation and 20% per-ETF cap, which can change the size and destination of the transfer.

How Northern Trust changes the allocation

We start with the Macro Seasons allocation, then use Northern Trust's monthly forecasts to adjust holdings within the 70% other-asset allocation. The same limits apply. The four season percentages stay unchanged, and government bonds and bills remain at 30%.

We average the available Growth, Inflation and Liquidity votes. When the score reaches ±0.25, the contrarian rule moves up to 20% of the fund between risk assets and defensive or currency funds. We exclude missing votes from the average. Without a qualifying score, we keep the Macro Seasons allocation.

The 2026-09-25 report has no US base-case Growth, Inflation or Liquidity forecasts that meet our scoring rule. This month's allocation therefore follows Macro Seasons without an analyst adjustment. We selected the rule using 2019-06 through 2022-12 and kept the same settings afterward.

Emerging-market allocation

The portfolio uses the Growth/Inflation season percentages shown above. Liquidity adjusts the holdings separately.

When Spring has the highest season weight and EEM outperforms SPY from twelve months ago to one month ago, 25% of US-stock exposure can move to EEM, within the 20% ETF cap. This month's transfer is 10.79% of the fund. EEM totals 10.79% before the Northern Trust adjustment. Government holdings remain at 30%.

ETF baskets and portfolio rules
SeasonStarting allocation
SpringSMH 21.5%, GLD 15%, QQQ 10%, GDX 8.5%, XLC 7.5%, IWF 5%, XHB 5%, IEF 5%, XLK 5%, BIL 17.5%
SummerSMH 20.66%, DBC 40.12%, XLV 18.76%, XLE 20.46%
FallGLD 30%, IEF 20%, BIL 35%, UUP 10%, XLP 5%
WinterSMH 15%, GLD 20%, QQQ 10%, GDX 10%, XLC 10%, IWF 10%, XHB 5%, XLK 10%, XLY 10%

These are the starting allocations. BIL, a Treasury-bill ETF, represents CASH. Half of each season allocation uses these percentages. The other half gives more weight to funds with lower trailing 36-month volatility. We combine the four allocations using the season percentages, then apply the liquidity, momentum and 150-day trend rules. We set government bonds and bills to 30%, cap each other ETF at 20%, and assign any remaining weight to the existing defensive and currency funds. The Northern Trust adjustment comes last.

Each basket totals 100%. The final portfolio combines the baskets and can include additional defensive funds to meet the allocation limits. GDX owns mining companies, so we treat it as stocks. GLD holds physical gold.

Portfolio growth · starting value 100

Macro Seasons + Northern Trust TiltMacro Seasons70% ACWI / 30% IEF
PortfolioAnnual returnLargest loss
from a peak
Return /
largest loss
Annual
volatility

Annual return includes compounding. The largest loss is the cumulative decline from an earlier peak, measured using daily values. Dividing annual return by the size of that loss gives the Calmar ratio. Volatility measures how widely returns fluctuate.

Backtest dates, costs and limitations

Both portfolios rebalance at the first trading close each month. Existing holdings earn that day's return before the trade. We charge 0.10% times the share of the portfolio traded, measured as half the sum of absolute weight changes. Adjusted prices include distributions. Returns already include these costs.

The first decision is 31 March 2017, when all five growth readings and all four inflation readings have enough history. The first trade is at the 3 April close. The new holdings earn returns from 4 April. Each chart starts at 100 before its first included return. Shorter periods keep the same historical holdings and restart the displayed value at 100. We measure daily drawdown from the running peak, including that starting value.

We use the same corrected growth/inflation calculation throughout the comparison. Liquidity, portfolio rules and the Northern Trust tilt remain unchanged. Before eligible Northern Trust reports begin in 2019, its line follows Macro Seasons without an analyst adjustment.

We selected the Northern Trust rule using June 2019 through December 2022. We adopted the revised baskets on 6 October 2026 after reviewing historical comparisons. All displayed periods are therefore backtests of rules chosen after reviewing historical data. They cannot be treated as untouched out-of-sample results or live performance.

The October allocation is a recalculated research target. We adopted it after October's scheduled trading date. November is the first prospective monthly target. The earlier simulations and separate paper portfolio remain archived and unchanged.

We check growth/inflation publication dates, but have not verified the precise release times. M2 uses ALFRED. The other liquidity series retain data-revision risk. Today's ETF list also cannot establish which funds were approved in earlier years.

Daily portfolio values and returns CSVSource readings and calculations JSON

October 2026 allocation

The table compares Macro Seasons with the final allocation after the Northern Trust Tilt. Positive changes show where the tilt added weight. Negative changes show where it reduced weight.

CategoryMacro SeasonsWith NT TiltChange
Government bonds and bills
ETFMacro SeasonsWith NT TiltChange
BILTreasury bills30.00%30.00%+0.00 pp
SHY1-3 year Treasuries0.00%0.00%+0.00 pp
IEF7-10 year Treasuries0.00%0.00%+0.00 pp
TLT20+ year Treasuries0.00%0.00%+0.00 pp
TIPInflation-linked Treasuries0.00%0.00%+0.00 pp
30.00%30.00%+0.00 pp
Broad equities and value
ETFMacro SeasonsWith NT TiltChange
ACWIGlobal equities0.00%0.00%+0.00 pp
SPYS&P 5000.00%0.00%+0.00 pp
VLUEUS value stocks0.00%0.00%+0.00 pp
IWFUS large-cap growth1.91%1.91%+0.00 pp
1.91%1.91%+0.00 pp
Technology and semiconductors
ETFMacro SeasonsWith NT TiltChange
QQQNasdaq 1002.54%2.54%+0.00 pp
SMHSemiconductors9.24%9.24%+0.00 pp
XLKTechnology1.89%1.89%+0.00 pp
13.66%13.66%+0.00 pp
Small caps and housing
ETFMacro SeasonsWith NT TiltChange
IWMUS small caps0.00%0.00%+0.00 pp
XHBHomebuilders0.00%0.00%+0.00 pp
0.00%0.00%+0.00 pp
Emerging markets
ETFMacro SeasonsWith NT TiltChange
EEMEmerging markets10.79%10.79%+0.00 pp
10.79%10.79%+0.00 pp
Cyclical sectors
ETFMacro SeasonsWith NT TiltChange
XLEEnergy4.61%4.61%+0.00 pp
XLBMaterials0.00%0.00%+0.00 pp
XLIIndustrials0.00%0.00%+0.00 pp
XLYConsumer discretionary0.00%0.00%+0.00 pp
4.61%4.61%+0.00 pp
Defensive equities
ETFMacro SeasonsWith NT TiltChange
XLPConsumer staples0.00%0.00%+0.00 pp
XLUUtilities0.00%0.00%+0.00 pp
XLVHealthcare7.96%7.96%+0.00 pp
USMVMinimum-volatility US stocks4.22%4.22%+0.00 pp
12.18%12.18%+0.00 pp
Gold
ETFMacro SeasonsWith NT TiltChange
GLDGold0.00%0.00%+0.00 pp
0.00%0.00%+0.00 pp
Commodities
ETFMacro SeasonsWith NT TiltChange
DBCBroad commodities12.75%12.75%+0.00 pp
CPERCopper0.00%0.00%+0.00 pp
12.75%12.75%+0.00 pp
Currencies
ETFMacro SeasonsWith NT TiltChange
UUPUS dollar8.77%8.77%+0.00 pp
FXYJapanese yen5.33%5.33%+0.00 pp
FXFSwiss franc0.00%0.00%+0.00 pp
14.09%14.09%+0.00 pp
Communication services
ETFMacro SeasonsWith NT TiltChange
XLCCommunication services0.00%0.00%+0.00 pp
0.00%0.00%+0.00 pp
Gold mining stocks
ETFMacro SeasonsWith NT TiltChange
GDXGold mining stocks0.00%0.00%+0.00 pp
0.00%0.00%+0.00 pp
Using the allocation for GSMIF's macro views

These holdings express our macro preferences as portfolio weights. They show which assets receive more or less capital and how the allocation differs from the benchmark.

An extra 5 percentage points in a category describes an allocation preference. It does not imply a 5% expected return. For Black–Litterman, the PM team needs to translate these preferences into return views over an agreed period and assign uncertainty to each view. The weights shown here provide no calibrated return forecasts.

ETFs available to this allocation

ACWI, BIL, CPER, DBC, EEM, FXF, FXY, GDX, GLD, IEF, IWF, IWM, QQQ, SHY, SMH, SPY, TIP, TLT, USMV, UUP, VLUE, XHB, XLB, XLC, XLE, XLI, XLK, XLP, XLU, XLV, XLY.

Corporate bond funds and leveraged products are excluded. Bitcoin and silver are outside the currently adopted set. A fund needs its own price history for 13 consecutive months, with measurable return variation, before it can be used. All funds in the adopted baskets and additional defensive holdings are refreshed monthly.

Category weights and differences CSV